Kollar's 1844 holotype of Rhynchina obliqualis was lost for a period, during which the replacement name Hypena masurialis Guenée, 1854, was suggested. Subsequently the holotype was found, and so now the junior replacement name is no longer necessary, see https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/ANNA_96B_0369-0372.pdf and https://www.inaturalist.org/posts/61846-hypena-masurialis-in-australia
Rhynchina obliqualis (Kollar, [1844]); Don I believe you are correct. Funet also shows Rhynchina obliqualis (Kollar, [1844]) with the replacement name Hypena masurialis Guenée, 1854 as a synonym. The Australian Faunal Directory uses Rhynchina obliquarlis (Kollar, 1844) and seem to be the ones to introduce the r as it is not in the original description and not used by Funet.
After all that, looking at the type image in that paper and this statement google translated from the orig description (From the front outer corner, a white stripe runs obliquely through the wing surface to the middle of the rear edge. ) this cannot be Rhynchina obliqualis but looks like Hypena simplicalis as shown on iNats which is not in the Australian Faunal Directory. I will keep looking.
The diagonal forewing stripe certainly appears off-white in that photo, whereas yours has a chestnut stripe. That certainly resembles Nick's photo at https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/232203139 but why are they not Hypena subvittalis ?
Don't believe it is Hypena subvittalis. Probably an unnamed species that somehow got referred to on BOLD as Rhynchina obliqualis, described from Kashmir, while iNat decided it was the African species Hypena simplicalis
The AlA seems to recognise Hypena simplicalis despie the AFD not doing so. The 'snout', to me, seems too short for H. subvittalis, more like H. simplicalis as on iNat and the ALA.
While I note all are not research grade and there is more than one species illustrated, many matching my specimen are noted as research grade. However, mine seems a variation from the original description, and the BOLD images from Africa (the Type location, Natale a village in Central District of Botswana), in which the line, running from the middle of the inner margin to the Costa well before the apex, is followed by a broad band of lighter colour which in turn is followed by an almost blackish band mostly made up of irregular large dots. The following from iNats seems a good example of Hypena simplicalis. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/58294498 The original description was of a ♀, is mine a ♂, without the lighter area followed by the blackish band or something else? A further possible problem is the fact that Hypena simplicalis was synonymized with Hypena (Phaleana) lividalis Hübner, 1790 by M. Lödl, 1994 as is shown as such on the funet site but not recognized on the Afromoths.net and Atlas of African Lepidoptera sites.
Describe how you intend to use these images and/or audio files and your request will be sent to the author for consideration.
Your request has been successfully submitted to the author for consideration.
799,975 sightings of 21,603 species from 13,464 contributors CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.